

![]() Features: In this age of instant
this and disposable that, Mark Nixon
writes about the joys of
cloth nappies Santa
Claus is Coming to TownYes, but does it have to be in the form of a parade? writes Hugh Joughin.
Section
59 ... ExposedAlternative ways of discipline, according to Child Youth and Family. What Are We
Doing Today? Child-friendly cafes in Wellington and Christchurch. A Very Slow
RecoveryCatching up on 'Andrew', who was left brain-injured after a serious accident. Book
Review: Men After Separation Opinion:
Discrimination Download pdf (8 MB) |
In Brief: Child Support Amendment Bill Proposed The bill includes provision for penalty fees to be waived, provided that liable parents enter some
kind of repayment arrangement for their existing debt. Expatriate liable parents accounted
for the highest levels of unpaid debt; more than $312 million of the
total owed. A Christchurch father who said he was “squeaky clean”, still
owed $25,000 at one point, most of which was penalties incurred because
Inland Revenue thought he was paying the wrong rate. “The tax department cannot pick up a
mistake for about six months and they continue to charge you penalties”
he said. “If you try and work it out they will not negotiate with you
until you have paid the penalties. That's why so many guys are in debt”. It is hoped the Bill will appear in
parliament before Christmas.
Campaign Against Family Violence The Families Commission is planning a
study of people's attitudes and behaviour towards family violence, with
a view to changing people's attitudes. At the conference, the wider
impact of television viewing was also on the agenda. British
psychologist Doctor Aric Sigman proposed that parents place a total ban
on children younger than three from watching television, and restrict
older children to an hour a day. Leaving the television on all the time
was also considered to be particularly damaging. 'Working For Families' Package Under Fire The Child Poverty Action group is claiming that aspects of
the governments new “Working for families” package discriminates
against thousands of New Zealand children. Under provision of the Human
Rights Act, the lobby group has been given permission to take their
case to the Human Rights Review Tribunal. The group’s claim is that the current Child Tax Credit and
the Work Payment discriminates against the 300,000 parents who are
currently on benefits or who don’t work enough hours to be eligible for
extra payments. The case could be a long drawn out affair, and it is
likely that the government won’t be legally obliged to change the
policy, even if the lobby groups wins the case. However, the case could
be a groundbreaking one in terms of future policies.
|
Editorial: Caring For
Our Kids
Following on from the “Take the pressure
down” article in the last issue, it's interesting to read media reports that pre-school child
care facilities in Auckland are bursting at the seams. Long waiting lists and insatiable demand for services is
evident up and down the country. Not only that, but the average length
of time that parents are requesting is spiraling upwards, leading to
child care centres needing to review the actual length of sessions
times being offered. This inevitably leads to larger classes, less time
for each child, and burnt out child care workers. Undoubtedly, financial pressures on families
is partly responsible for the explosion in demand for these services,
as both parents work to try and make ends meet. The government has made
it fairly clear that they want mothers to (re)enter the workforce as
soon as possible after giving birth, judging by their “Working for
Families” package. According
to the blurb, the initiative is designed to make it easier to work and
raise a family. The less publicised factor in
the huge growth of child care centres, is parents who “want the best”
for their offspring, and are keen to enter their children into learning
environments as soon as possible. The evidence of this is seen at
school level, where parents scramble to enrol their children at the
most exclusive of private schools. Half of all five year olds are
turned away from the ‘best’ schools each year, and the desire to
get into certain school zones is always reflected in the buoyancy of certain exclusive real
estate markets. This rat race for under fives has got to such
a stage, where Clare Freeborn of “Mainly Kids” says she advises people
to enrol their kids even before they are born! I can go along with the
idea of singing and talking to your baby “in utero”, but the question must be asked, “how young is too young?” It
would be a good question for all parents to ponder over Christmas and
New Year, as we strive for a relaxing and low-stress festive season. Hugh
Joughin |