
Features:
Forgiveness
Is forgiveness still a virtue worth
striving for? And how do we teach it to our children. Psychological
researcher Myron
Friesen is on to the subject .
SORRY - The author did not
permit reproduction of his article on the web.
"My Son's Got a Girl
Pregnant"
Harald Breiding-Buss talked
to a couple of dads whose sons were a bit ahead of their time...
Striving
for Parenthood
Ron Thow explains
about assisted reproduction and asked people about their experiences.
Separated
- What Now?
Some solid advice on how to keep your relationships with your children
on track. By Ron
Thow.
Blended
A first person account by a father who started a family - again. His
partner, too, has children from a previous relationship. By
Peter Walker.
An Ordinary
Dad
One man's fight for his children, reported by Brendon Smith
Good Men-
Good Sons
Gwenda
Smithie sings the
praises of her husband.
|
In Brief:
Growth in Single Parent Households Halted -
Census
The steady growth of
single-parent households that began in the early 80s has turned into a
small decline, according to 2006 Census data.
30% of households with children were single parent households in 2006,
compared to 31% in 2001. Only the West Coast regions of both islands
were bucking the trend with slight increases.
The drop in single parent
households was strongest in the South Island, especially in Canterbury,
Otago and Tasman regions. The region with the highest proportion of
single parent households is Gisborne at 40%, the lowest is Tasman at
24%.
More detailed data, such as sex of parent in single parent households,
or age of parents, is not yet available from Statistics New Zealand.
Census and other statistical data is available from the Statistics New
Zealand web site www.stats.govt.nz or through any of their offices.
|
The steady growth of single-parent
households that began in the early 80s has turned into a small decline,
according to 2006 Census data.
30% of households with children were single parent households in 2006,
compared
to 31% in 2001. Only the West Coast regions of both islands were
bucking the
trend with slight increases.
The
drop in single parent
households was strongest in the South Island, especially in Canterbury,
Otago
and Tasman regions. The region with the highest proportion of single
parent
households is Gisborne at 40%, the lowest is Tasman at 24%.
More
detailed data, such as sex of parent in single parent households, or
age
of parents, is not yet available from Statistics New Zealand. Census
and other
statistical data is available from the Statistics New Zealand web site
www.stats.govt.nz or through any of their offices.
Father Initiatives Snubbed by Government
Funders
Funding for
father services in New Zealand remains marginal after both national and
local
government funders have declined parting with money for solid project
proposals
by the Father & Child Trust. The Trust is the only legal entity in
New
Zealand providing on-the-ground services specifically for fathers and
the
children in their care.
S.K.I.P., a
fund administered by the Ministry of Social Development, declined an
application for renewal of funding for the Trust's parent education
project,
targeting specifically marginalised groups of fathers, after having
provided
financial support since 2004. The position was subsequently made
redundant.
A research
project aiming to establish support needs of solo fathers was declined
by the
'Blue Skies Fund', a Families Commission fund. And shortly before
Christmas the
Christchurch City Council decided not to support a Trust project on
parent
education for inmates at Christchurch Prison's Youth Unit for funding
through
the Ministry of Youth Development’s 'Youth Development Partnership
Fund'.
In all three
cases the reason given was that the funders felt applications did not
match the
criteria closely enough.
The Trust has
never received significant amounts of government funding in its 10 year
history
with the exception of two years of SKIP funding worth about $55,000.
Its
teenage fathers survey, for example, had been funded by a
Netherlands-based
Early Childhood Development agency because no monies could be obtained
in New
Zealand.
New Fathers Misunderstood
Says Nelson Study
A study by the
Nelson-Marlborough Institute of Technology and the Public Health
Service has
found that new fathers are worried about different things than what
their
partners think they are worried about!
The new fathers participating in the study ranked three issues most
important
of all: the lack of involvement in the transition process to
parenthood, a
stressed relationship with the partner, and the joys of being a dad.
However, the
mothers in the study thought their men are at least just as concerned
with
money, sex and the gender of the baby - issues that were mentioned in
the men's
interviews, but not even ranked as important.
"The data ranked as important by the women (but not by the men) tends
to
reflect commonly held views about how men respond to fatherhood." write
researchers David Mitchell and Philip Chapman. "This raises questions
about discourse that is dominant, where it originates and whose
interests it
reflects."
The researchers
acknowledge the limitations of their study, which involved only 11
couples who
were interviewed in gender-specific groups before the birth and 6
months after.
The fathers in the study also widely criticised not being involved by
midwives,
Plunket nurses or other providers and ranked this as one of the top
issues.
Father &
Child Trust Coordinator Harald Breiding-Buss, who has worked with men
in
antenatal classes for 9 years, agrees with the findings. "The failure
of
'maternity' services to address, or even know about, new fathers real
concerns
is a major contributing factor to relationships making an irreversible
turn for
the worse around this time", he says. "We're having a 21st century
maternity service system based on 1950's stereotypical beliefs."
Previous
research by the Mitchell/Chapman team had found similar discrepancies
between
views and needs that men expressed to their interviewers, and
perceptions held
by maternity health professionals.
Young Jaibirds Get Parent Education
Eight teenage
fathers or fathers-to-be aged between 16 and 18 at Christchurch
Prison's Youth
Unit went through a five-session course on parenting and fatherhood
facilitated
by Father & Child Trust staff at the request of the Youth Unit. The
course
is believed to be the first such initiative anywhere in New Zealand.
The course was
designed after a focus group was held to determine what participants
most
wanted to get out of it, and the resulting course covered early
childhood
development as well as Family Law issues and the impact of 'lifestyle
choices'
such as drugs and alcohol on parenting.
Feedback
obtained after the course was unanimous in that the course was too
short and
more was needed.
Trust workers
were surprised by the high proportion of parents in the 40-bed unit,
which is
about 100 times higher than in the general population of this age group.
|
Editorial:
Sexism
I admit
I’m a bit confused as to what constitutes sexism.
When our
local soccer club sent the enrolment documents for the upcoming season,
there
was an option to tick for girls who wanted to play in an all-girls
team. Boys
weren’t given an option.
When I
mentioned to a friend that I thought boys should be able to choose to
play in
an all-boys team as well she was aghast. ‘That would be sexism!’
It’s not
a do-or-die issue for me—both my children are girls and therefore get
the
options— but it certainly is not equal treatment.
This
sort of thing happens a lot. My wife got herself some information about
an
upcoming women’s outdoor festival. Heaps of mother-daughter outdoor
activities
in there, fantastic stuff.
But why
are there no equivalents for men? In fact, when that all-male English
cricket
association once again declined to admit female members a few years
ago, that
was news that went around the world—the last old male bastion refusing
to fall,
chauvinism at its worst.
So what
makes it okay for women to organise themselves in male-free clubs or
events,
but not for men? More importantly, what does that suggest to our boys
and
girls, if girls have the choice to be without boys, but not vice versa?
My
daughters keep saying that boys are not allowed to hit girls. The other
day I
replied that girls are also not allowed to hit boys. My younger
daughter’s
reaction to that was ‘Oh Dad, you know what I mean’. I wish I did. In
my
opinion noone is allowed to hit anyone. How come that an 11-year old
girl
believes there are more restrictions on what boys are allowed to do
than on
girls?
Part of
me, though, thinks that’s alright. Ironically it’s the chauvinist part:
the
part that thinks females are worthy of special protection from males,
and males
have to be gentlemen and not exclude women from anything they want.
You
really have to dig quite deep into the box of stereotypes to justify
different
treatment of boys and girls, men and women, on the sole basis of
gender.
Meanwhile it worries me that our kids somehow get the impression that
girls are
the privileged sex. If boys, somehow deep down, feel they are the
underdogs,
that can’t be good for relationships.
Personally
I think both boys and girls (and men and women) should have
opportunities (but
not obligations) to do stuff together without the other sex there. But
having
said that, there were times in my life when I couldn’t imagine anything
worse
than having to do something with only other boys…
Certainly,
if we want equality of opportunities for both sexes, we have to start
looking
both ways.
Harald
Breiding-Buss
|
Parenting:
Role Models
with Ron Thow
Parents are the first and, hopefully,
best role models for their children. This, of course, means that we
can’t
always get away with just telling our children what to do—especially if
we are
doing something different.
Younger children especially tend to
see the world in black and white, right and wrong. It isn’t until they
are much
older that they begin to realise that there are shades of grey in the
middle as
well.
So, if we as parents are to help our
children to become the best versions of themselves that they can be we
have to
walk the walk as well as talk the talk. The foods we eat, the exercise
we get
or how we interact with others—showing appropriate manners and
respect—all of
these things are important and our children’s behaviour will generally
reflect
on our own.
But before you decide that you have
been sentenced to a life of perfect behaviour so that your children
will be
good adults, parents are not the only role models that children take
heed of.
Children will find a range of role
models in a wide variety of places, from the fictional on television
and in
books, to sporting icons, teachers, friends and other family members.
One of the most important skills that
you can help your children to develop is that of evaluating potential
role
models.
Collectively these people are known as
‘heroic’ role models. They are people that others look up to, aspire to
be like
and want to copy. In NZ this especially means sports stars and
celebrities.
The heroic role model is a very
powerful icon and this can be a huge benefit when they model pro-social
behaviours, but an equally big problem if the modelin question is
involved in
negative or anti-social behaviour.
These role models are the mainstay of
the advertising industry—after all, if Sarah Ullmer eats McDonalds then
it
can’t be ‘junk’, can it? Which means that the perception of them can be
distorted in various ways.
This distortion can result in
unrealistic expectations for the child who wants to emulate them. The
cool
loner hero who breaks the rules and gets the mission accomplished is
fine as a
fictional movie character, but generally wouldn’t last long in the real
world.
So, teaching your children to make
judgments about their heroes is very important. All sorts of things
stem from
that skill. The ability to learn from others’ mistakes or copy others’
successes, creating self-respect and respect for others, and
identifying
societal expectations and norms, to name a few. So how do we foster
critical
thinking about potential role models?
· Expose
your children to a variety of role models. Don’t
just rely on television or sports. In this way they begin to learn that
different people have different things to offer, different skills or
perspectives and that it is okay that one approach to problem-solving
doesn’t
fix every situation.
· Talk
to them about people that they see in daily life,
their teachers, friends or family for instance, and ask questions.
Asking them
if they think that the actions or behaviour of someone else was
appropriate,
right or wrong in a given situation will start to build the foundation
for
critical thinking and decision-making about your child’s own behaviour.
· Point
out when you have made an error. If you demonstrate
that errors are just part of being human and that how you deal with
them is
important you foster the child’s taking
personal responsibility for their mistakes. This is an important part
of
developing confidence, assertive behaviour, and a healthy self-image.
· Encourage
children to reach for role models that will
stretch them in life. Getting your children to strive for their own
goals is
much more positive than simply pushing them. They are more likely to
achieve
more of their potential if they are in the driver’s seat and you are
the
co-pilot than if the positions are reversed.
But whatever other role models your child finds, try to be
the best one that you can be.
|