
Househubbies
| Issue: | 11,June 2000 | Page: | 4-6 |
|
Abstract: |
At home Dads are becoming more prevalent. |
| Keywords: | Fathers, families, children. |
The
at-home dad has clearly become a common sight in our society: men
pushing prams
around their neighbourhoods on an average weekday morning have invaded
just
about every community in New Zealand.
This
includes those cases, where a father
works mainly night- and weekend shifts and takes care of his children
while his
partner is working during the day. Some of these men do not only spend
more
time with their children, but they also work more than their wives.
They are
primary income providers and primary caregivers.
Then
there are the fathers working from home,
rocking the baby to sleep in one arm and designing a web page with the
other,
while mum is out working the checkout at the local Countdown. With
flexible and
changing working hours for both, who is to say who is the primary
caregiver?
Where
a man is not in paid employment,
couples often find themselves battling all sorts of stereotypes. There
is often
a lingering suspicion that the word "househusband" or "at-home
dad" is just a guise for a lazy hangabout, who gives the kids into
childcare and lets mum do the housework when she comes home. He either
spends
most of his time hanging around with his mates in the pub - or in the
bed of
other housewives. Boys will be boys after all.
In
the newsmedia, the words
"parent" and "mother" are often used interchangeably;
non-working fathers are routinely referred to as "unemployed", as if
it didn't matter whether a man has children or not. The "unpaid work"
of mothers is a hot issue for the women's movement, but men still
struggle to
get any acknowledgement for the time they spend with children. Somehow
society
seems to think raising children is work for women, but a hobby for men.
Often
it is relatives who show at least
considerable unease, if their well-qualified and reasonably
well-earning
son/nephew/cousin shows the wrong priorities: his family. He will hear
comments
like "you are wasting your life" and "noone will want to employ
you again with this sort of mark on your CV". They are not entirely
wrong:
a US study has found that fathers who take parental leave end up 25%
worse off
financially a few years down their career path than fathers who don't.
Many
employers, probably sub-consciously, see the the birth of their male
employee's
first child as a test case: will he remain fully committed to his work
or will
they have to look for someone else now to promote through the ranks? A
good
father plays with his children, but he does so after work.
At-home
dads are by no means a new phenomenon.
Many authors have pointed out that it is, in fact, a very old model if
combined
with work from home. It is the abscence of fathers from home for long
periods
of time on a daily basis that is a new development in human history,
and that
was cross-culturally very rare before modern Western societies
developed. Some
authors even go so far as to say that the key success factor for
Western
societies - the drive of individuals to earn money and more money - is
really a
result of mainly men compensating for a crippled, emotionally distant relationship with their fathers.
Primitive
cultures with men as the primary -
or near-equal - caregivers are rare, but not unheard of. Babies of the
Aka
pygmies spend as much time with their fathers as with their mothers,
and the
men appear to feel more responsible for them than the women. The boys
in this
culture display a sense of family and compassion for babies not seen in
Western
cultures. And the men of the Wayuru indians in Colombia also
traditionally
spend more time with the children than their partners, who tend to be
out of
the village for most of the day, often trading with other tribes.
In
an economy that requires increasing
flexibility from its workforce, and that decreasingly distinguishes
between
male and female employees, the househusband-working wife family is one
model
among many others and one that is bound to become more common. Indeed,
our
society would severely and permanently disadvantage men if women's
increasing
opportunities in the workforce and on higher salary levels is not
matched by a
social acceptance of the father at home. But as it is, our society has
a long
way to go and some say it will require a revolution with equal
intensity and
drive as the women's liberation movement in the 60s and 70s. While more
and
more men find themselves at home with the children more and more often,
many of
them find themselves unable to take genuine pride in what they are
doing.
Society's
focus on the mother-child bond and
ignorance of the father-child relationship also impacts on the
children. The
vast majority of children's picture books are about one main theme: the
bond
between a mother and a child. There are very few - if any - children's
books
that show a father interacting with his daughter in the abscence of the
mother,
and not many more about fathers and
sons. A childcare worker, even if aware that a particular child
is
mainly with his dad, will almost automatically tell him to show the
picture he
has drawn to his mum. Children consistently
get the
message that the father is secondary in their lives than the mother.
The result
is that an at-home father may not get as much positive emotional
feedback from
his children as the average at-home mum would. But this emotional
feedback is a
parent's "payment" for being at home with the child in the first
place, your trade-off for the hard currency you would be earning
otherwise!
And
yet, at-home dads are badly needed to fill
a lack of male role models for our children. Fathers who get involved
in
Playcentre or primary school often find themselves surrounded by
children
hungry for male attention. These are not only children of single
mothers. Some
researchers suspect that boys watch more TV than girls because unlike
girls
they do not have enough real-life gender role models. As a result boys'
main
role models are men like Batman, the Ninja turtles or the cool
teenagers from
the Cartoon Network, and girls get a rather distorted view of what men
are and
aren't. A father is but one male role model, but children of both sexes
need
many more. At-home dads have an opportunity to be out in the community,
meet
the need of other children to talk to a
man, to let them be challenged and
supported by men. Men come in many different varieties, from dangerous
to
protective, from playful to serious. Our children need to meet many men
in
their lives in order to pick the role model that suits their own unique
and
individual makeup, and to learn to tell the dangerous from the safe...